
28
In our environment, MS Exchange 2007 and Linux virtual machines run at Site A and replicate to Site B.
MS SQL Server 2008, IIS and the file server VMs run at Site B and replicate to Site A Figure 17 shows the
Site Recovery Manager configuration summary for Site A with the local Exchange and Linux protection
groups and the recovery plans for SQL Server and File Servers from site B.
Figure 17. Site A protection groups and Site B recovery plans
Performance testing
This section of the testing aims to characterize the performance overhead attributable to synchronous data
replication.
Microsoft Exchange 2007
We used Microsoft JetStress to exercise the Mailbox server storage. The environment is configured with 14
Exchange storage groups. The JetStress utility identifies the maximum I/O throughput that a given
configuration can sustain. Each test run is set for a period of two hours. To baseline the throughput, the
same JetStress tests are executed with and without data replication.
The disk configuration for the protected and non protected virtual machines is identical. Each configuration
is presented with the same set of Exchange logical unit numbers (LUNs) from the EVA array that uses two
disk groups. There is no physical disk sharing between the two LUNs housing the Exchange databases and
the two LUNs housing the Exchange transaction logs. All EVA LUNs are configured as RAID 1. The virtual
machine boot disk is housed on a shared VMFS volume, while the Exchange data disks use Raw Device
Mapping. Table 2 shows the disk layout.
Table 2. Exchange disk layout
OS files and application binaries
Exchange storage groups 1-7
Exchange storage groups 8-14
Comentarios a estos manuales